Spreading misinformation sign of disrespect towards law: EC sources
New Delhi: Election Commission sources on Tuesday refuted Rahul Gandhi’s allegations of abnormal voter turnout in the Maharashtra polls, asserting that any “misinformation” being spread was a sign of disrespect towards the law and hurt the efforts of political workers and polling personnel.
They also said such claims brought disrepute to the thousands of representatives appointed by political parties and demotivated lakhs of election staff working untiringly and transparently during elections.
After any unfavourable verdict by voters, trying to defame the Election Commission (EC) by saying that it had been compromised is completely absurd, the poll body sources said.
On Monday, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Gandhi alleged in Boston, US, that, in simple terms, more people voted in the Maharashtra Assembly election than there were adults in the state.
“The Election Commission gave us a voting figure for 5:30 pm, and between 5:30 pm and 7:30 pm, 65 lakh voters voted. This is physically
impossible. For a voter to vote, it takes approximately three minutes and, if you do the math, it would mean that there were lines of voters till 2 am but this did not happen,” he had said.
Rejecting the claims, the sources underlined that 6,40,87,588 (6.40 crore) electors who reached the polling stations from 7 am to 6 pm voted in the Maharashtra polls.
About 58 lakh votes were polled per hour on an average, they said.
Going by the average trend, nearly 1.16 crore voters could have voted in the last two hours, they added.
“Therefore, casting of 65 lakh votes by electors in two hours is much below the average hourly voting trend,” an EC functionary pointed out.
The sources noted that voting progressed in the presence of polling agents formally appointed by candidates or political parties in every polling booth.
The Congress’ nominated candidates or their authorised agents had not raised “any substantiated allegations” regarding any kind of abnormal voting at the time of scrutiny before returning officers and election observers the next day.
On the issue of alleged fudging of electoral data, the sources said voter lists in India, including
Maharashtra, were prepared according to the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.
According to the law, either just before the elections or once every year, special summary revision of electoral rolls is conducted and its final copy handed over to all national or state political parties.
